update

.gitea/workflows/build_hugo_image.yml

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ name: Build Hugo Docker Image
 
 on:
   push:
-    branches:
-      - hugo_update
+    paths:
+      - "hugo.Dockerfile"
 
 jobs:
   build docker:
@@ -11,11 +11,6 @@ jobs:
     steps:
       - name: checkout code
         uses: actions/checkout@v3
-      # - name: Get changed files
-      #   id: changed-files
-      #   uses: tj-actions/changed-files@v42
-      #   with:
-      #     files: hugo.Dockerfile
       - name: Set up QEMU
         uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v2
       - name: Set up Docker Buildx

Dockerfile

@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ FROM git.d3vyce.fr/d3vyce/hugo:latest AS build
 WORKDIR /opt/blog
 COPY . /opt/blog/
 
-RUN git submodule update --init --recursive
+RUN git submodule update --init --recursive && \
+    git -C themes/blowfish/ checkout v2.58.0
 RUN hugo
 
 # Publish Stage

README.md

@@ -7,5 +7,7 @@ CGO_ENABLED=1 go install -tags extended github.com/gohugoio/hugo@latest
 git submodule update --recursive
 git lfs pull
 
+git -C themes/blowfish/ checkout [TAG]
+git submodule update --remote --merge
 hugo server  --buildDrafts
 ```

content/posts/migrate-from-ghost-to-hugo/index.md

@@ -145,7 +145,22 @@ jobs:
 https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/164
 
 ## Conclusion: before/after comparison
+Après avoir terminé la migration, j'ai comparé les 2 solutions.
 
+### Performance
+Lighthouse result for Ghost based blog:
 ![Ghost based blog lighthouse result](img/image-1.webp)
 
+Lighthouse result for Hugo based blog:
 ![Hugo based blog lighthouse result](img/image-2.webp)
+
+| Metric                   | Ghost (Dawn) | Hugo (Blowfish) |
+|--------------------------|--------------|-----------------|
+| First Contentful Paint   | 0.5 s        | 0.3 s           |
+| Largest Contentful Paint | 0.6 s        | 0.4 s           |
+| Total Blocking Time      | 0 ms         | 0 ms            |
+| Cumulative Layout Shift  | 0.001        | 0               |
+| Speed Index              | 0.6 s        | 0.3 s           |
+
+### Ressources
+

content/posts/uv-the-new-python-package-installer-written-in-rust/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+---
+title: "UV the new python package installer written in Rust"
+date: 2024-02-23
+draft: true
+slug: "uv-the-new-python-package-installer-written-in-rust"
+tags: ["ci/cd", "docker", "python", "tools"]
+type: "programming"
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+
+## UV benchmark
+Let's compare UV and VENV/PIP to see how this new solution performs: according to the creators, UV should be around 80x faster than `python -m venv` and 7x faster than `virtualenv`.
+
+After creating virtual environments with these different tools, I was able to obtain the following results:
+
+{{< chart >}}
+type: 'bar',
+data: {
+  labels: ['uv', 'virtualenv', 'venv'],
+  datasets: [{
+    data: [0.010, 0.153, 1.539],
+  }]
+},
+options: {
+  indexAxis: 'y',
+  elements: {
+    bar: {
+      borderWidth: 2,
+    }
+  },
+  responsive: true,
+  plugins: {
+    legend: {
+      display: false,
+    },
+    title: {
+      display: true,
+      text: 'Virtual environment creation'
+    }
+  }
+}
+{{< /chart >}}
+
+In my case, UV is ~15x faster than `virtualenv` and ~150x faster than `python -m venv`. I then tried installing python packets with UV and PIP to compare speeds:
+
+{{< chart >}}
+type: 'bar',
+data: {
+  labels: ['uv', 'uv+cache', 'pip'],
+  datasets: [{
+    data: [2.961, 0.413, 13.917],
+  }]
+},
+options: {
+  indexAxis: 'y',
+  elements: {
+    bar: {
+      borderWidth: 2,
+    }
+  },
+  responsive: true,
+  plugins: {
+    legend: {
+      display: false,
+    },
+    title: {
+      display: true,
+      text: 'Packages install (~100)'
+    }
+  }
+}
+{{< /chart >}}
+
+For packet insertion I find that UV is ~5x faster than pip and ~33x faster then `pip` with the UV cache.
+
+## Docker image for CI/CD
+UV
+
+```dockerfile
+FROM python:3.11-slim
+
+RUN python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip && \
+    pip3 install uv && \
+    uv venv && \
+    . /.venv/bin/activate && \
+    uv pip install ruff
+
+ENV VIRTUAL_ENV /.venv
+ENV PATH /.venv/bin:$PATH
+```
+
+```bash
+debian@debian:~/dev/images$ docker build -t uv_python .
+[...]
+debian@debian:~/dev/images$ docker run -it --rm uv_python bash
+root@ec910e7ea8eb:/# uv pip install django
+Resolved 3 packages in 483ms
+Downloaded 3 packages in 584ms
+Installed 3 packages in 150ms
+ + asgiref==3.7.2
+ + django==5.0.2
+ + sqlparse==0.4.4
+root@ec910e7ea8eb:/# python3
+Python 3.11.8 (main, Feb  7 2024, 22:49:54) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux
+Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
+>>> import django
+>>>
+```
+
+```yml
+[...]
+variables:
+  UV_CACHE_DIR: "$CI_PROJECT_DIR/.cache/uv"
+
+cache:
+  - key: uv-pip-cache
+    paths:
+      - $CI_PROJECT_DIR/.cache/uv
+[...]
+```

hugo.Dockerfile

@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ ENV GO111MODULE=on
 
 RUN apk update && \
     apk add --no-cache gcc musl-dev g++ git
-RUN go install -tags extended github.com/gohugoio/hugo@v0.122.0
+RUN go install -tags extended github.com/gohugoio/hugo@v0.123.3

themes/blowfish

@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit e7ce3860490e6b8f33578675b2898bc50d097513
+Subproject commit f2b934c8f471fa2bf31bcf4efe08be244d363e6f